"Feeling overwhelmed by the news? You’re not alone. There’s a lot of information out there, and it’s hard to break it all down and digest it properly. That’s why I, Bill Gates, invented Liquifact — an easy-to-absorb formula that ensures you’re getting all the right facts."
Good post. In 1878 Bechamp had proven that no one had isolated a virus or a germ. And since then no one in the 'science' can agree on what they are (there are bacteria imbibing cell membrane and detritus, they can't fly or walk or travel through the atmosphere).
The article title—“No virus has ever been proven to exist”—is not a position taken seriously by mainstream biology, medicine, microbiology, or virology. It’s a fringe claim associated with “terrain theory” and virus-denial movements. The evidence for viruses is overwhelming and comes from multiple independent lines of research.
A common tactic in these articles is to redefine words like “isolation” so narrowly that no virus could ever satisfy the requirement. They then claim that because viruses weren’t isolated according to their custom definition, viruses don’t exist. Scientists have repeatedly pointed out that viruses have been isolated, cultured, imaged, sequenced, and experimentally studied using standard virological methods.
Some of the strongest evidence that viruses exist includes:
* Direct visualization using electron microscopy.
* Isolation and growth of viruses in cell cultures.
* Sequencing of viral genomes.
* Tracking mutations and variants over time.
* Demonstrating infection and transmission in laboratory and real-world settings.
* Development of antiviral drugs that specifically target viral replication.
For example, the claim that SARS-CoV-2 was never isolated or proven to exist has been extensively fact-checked and found false. The virus has been isolated multiple times and sequenced on a massive scale worldwide.
One useful question when reading articles like this is:
If viruses don’t exist, how do they explain that scientists can sequence a viral genome, predict future variants from mutations, and then observe those exact mutations appearing and spreading in populations?
The virus-denial literature generally doesn’t provide a convincing alternative explanation for that.
with pictures here! https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/x-ray-crystallography-and-3d-computer
Jo
Liquifact: Daily Facts in a Bottle
"Feeling overwhelmed by the news? You’re not alone. There’s a lot of information out there, and it’s hard to break it all down and digest it properly. That’s why I, Bill Gates, invented Liquifact — an easy-to-absorb formula that ensures you’re getting all the right facts."
https://newworldhumor.substack.com/p/liquifact-daily-facts-in-a-bottle
'Liquifact' includes the word 'Fauci' so must be good stuff! :)
Liquifact: daily lies in a bucket of shit. There, fixed that for ya. You’re welcome. :)
Whatever you call them they kill finish Sars Cov2 and HIV showed us flames
Good post. In 1878 Bechamp had proven that no one had isolated a virus or a germ. And since then no one in the 'science' can agree on what they are (there are bacteria imbibing cell membrane and detritus, they can't fly or walk or travel through the atmosphere).
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3427559/
Not much else to say to this, basically as if the earth was flat.
The article title—“No virus has ever been proven to exist”—is not a position taken seriously by mainstream biology, medicine, microbiology, or virology. It’s a fringe claim associated with “terrain theory” and virus-denial movements. The evidence for viruses is overwhelming and comes from multiple independent lines of research.
A common tactic in these articles is to redefine words like “isolation” so narrowly that no virus could ever satisfy the requirement. They then claim that because viruses weren’t isolated according to their custom definition, viruses don’t exist. Scientists have repeatedly pointed out that viruses have been isolated, cultured, imaged, sequenced, and experimentally studied using standard virological methods.
Some of the strongest evidence that viruses exist includes:
* Direct visualization using electron microscopy.
* Isolation and growth of viruses in cell cultures.
* Sequencing of viral genomes.
* Tracking mutations and variants over time.
* Demonstrating infection and transmission in laboratory and real-world settings.
* Development of antiviral drugs that specifically target viral replication.
For example, the claim that SARS-CoV-2 was never isolated or proven to exist has been extensively fact-checked and found false. The virus has been isolated multiple times and sequenced on a massive scale worldwide.
One useful question when reading articles like this is:
If viruses don’t exist, how do they explain that scientists can sequence a viral genome, predict future variants from mutations, and then observe those exact mutations appearing and spreading in populations?
The virus-denial literature generally doesn’t provide a convincing alternative explanation for that.